[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb6be804-1649-4d17-839c-fe58a39baa1d@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 06:44:58 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: yuji2.ishikawa@...hiba.co.jp, laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
mchehab@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl,
nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/8] dt-bindings: media: platform: visconti: Add
Toshiba Visconti MIPI CSI-2 Receiver
On 17/12/2024 00:57, yuji2.ishikawa@...hiba.co.jp wrote:
>> On 25/11/2024 10:21, Yuji Ishikawa wrote:
>>> Adds the Device Tree binding documentation that allows to describe the
>>> MIPI CSI-2 Receiver found in Toshiba Visconti SoCs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yuji Ishikawa <yuji2.ishikawa@...hiba.co.jp>
>>> Reviewed-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>
>>
>>
>> How newly added patch can have already Rb tag? Was this review really, really
>> performed internally or you just satisfy some internal managers requirements
>> and fake the stats?
>>
>
> I added this Reviewed-by tag because the patch was reviewed internally.
What issues were identified by internal review, especially in the
context of bindings?
>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changelog v12:
>>> - Newly add bindings for CSI2RX driver
>>>
>>> .../media/toshiba,visconti5-csi2rx.yaml | 104
>> ++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/toshiba,visconti5-csi2rx.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/toshiba,visconti5-csi2rx.yam
>>> l
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/toshiba,visconti5-csi2rx.yam
>>> l
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..5488072bc82a
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/toshiba,visconti5-csi2rx
>>> +++ .yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) %YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id:
>>> +http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/toshiba,visconti5-csi2rx.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: Toshiba Visconti5 SoC MIPI CSI-2 receiver
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> + - Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>
>>> +
>>> +description: |-
>>
>> Drop |-
>>
>
> I'll drop "|-"
>
>>> + Toshiba Visconti5 SoC MIPI CSI-2 receiver device receives MIPI
>>> + CSI-2 video stream. Use with VIIF device. T.B.D
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + const: toshiba,visconti5-csi2rx
>>
>> Why this is called "RX"? Can you have a TX? I had impression that one cannot.
>>
>
> VIIF has only MIPI CSI2 receiver (CSI2RX). There's no TX for it.
So this device cannot be anything else? Then drop rx.
> Visconti also has VOIF (Video Output Interface) hardware which has MIPI CSI2 (not DSI) transmitter (CSI2TX).
Or this can be something else? Confusing.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists