[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <118bbd72-b1fb-4da2-b1bd-5a66ecfe7322@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:20:10 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>, claudiu.manoil@....com,
vladimir.oltean@....com, xiaoning.wang@....com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, frank.li@....com,
horms@...nel.org, idosch@...sch.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 3/4] net: enetc: add LSO support for i.MX95
ENETC PF
On 12/13/24 03:17, Wei Fang wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> index 09ca4223ff9d..41a3798c7564 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> @@ -533,6 +533,224 @@ static void enetc_tso_complete_csum(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring, struct tso_t *tso
> }
> }
>
> +static inline int enetc_lso_count_descs(const struct sk_buff *skb)
Please, don't use inline in c files
> +{
> + /* 4 BDs: 1 BD for LSO header + 1 BD for extended BD + 1 BD
> + * for linear area data but not include LSO header, namely
> + * skb_headlen(skb) - lso_hdr_len. And 1 BD for gap.
> + */
> + return skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags + 4;
> +}
> +static int enetc_lso_hw_offload(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct enetc_tx_swbd *tx_swbd;
> + struct enetc_lso_t lso = {0};
> + int err, i, count = 0;
> +
> + /* Initialize the LSO handler */
> + enetc_lso_start(skb, &lso);
> + i = tx_ring->next_to_use;
> +
> + enetc_lso_map_hdr(tx_ring, skb, &i, &lso);
> + /* First BD and an extend BD */
> + count += 2;
> +
> + err = enetc_lso_map_data(tx_ring, skb, &i, &lso, &count);
> + if (err)
> + goto dma_err;
> +
> + /* Go to the next BD */
> + enetc_bdr_idx_inc(tx_ring, &i);
> + tx_ring->next_to_use = i;
> + enetc_update_tx_ring_tail(tx_ring);
> +
> + return count;
> +
> +dma_err:
> + do {
> + tx_swbd = &tx_ring->tx_swbd[i];
> + enetc_free_tx_frame(tx_ring, tx_swbd);
> + if (i == 0)
> + i = tx_ring->bd_count;
> + i--;
> + } while (count--);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
I'm sorry for not catching the issue early, but apparently there is an
off-by-one in the above loop: if 'count' bds have been used, it will
attempt to free 'count + 1' of them.
The minimal fix should be using:
} while (--count);
/P
Powered by blists - more mailing lists