linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI: stm32: Add PCIe endpoint support for STM32MP25

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fdc487c4-cbdc-45ac-a79f-aff2b8ccafcc@foss.st.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:48:43 +0100
From: Christian Bruel <christian.bruel@...s.st.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
CC: <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, <kw@...ux.com>, <robh@...nel.org>,
        <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <cassel@...nel.org>,
        <quic_schintav@...cinc.com>, <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>,
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI: stm32: Add PCIe endpoint support for
 STM32MP25



On 12/16/24 17:17, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 11:02:07AM +0100, Christian Bruel wrote:
>> Hi Manivanna,
>>
>> On 12/3/24 16:22, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 04:51:18PM +0100, Christian Bruel wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> +static int stm32_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct stm32_pcie *stm32_pcie = to_stm32_pcie(pci);
>>>> +	int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (stm32_pcie->link_status == STM32_PCIE_EP_LINK_ENABLED) {
>>>> +		dev_dbg(pci->dev, "Link is already enabled\n");
>>>> +		return 0;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	ret = stm32_pcie_enable_link(pci);
>>>> +	if (ret) {
>>>> +		dev_err(pci->dev, "PCIe cannot establish link: %d\n", ret);
>>>> +		return ret;
>>>> +	}
>>>
>>> How the REFCLK is supplied to the endpoint? From host or generated locally?
>>
>>  From Host only, we don't support the separated clock model.
>>
> 
> OK. So even without refclk you are still able to access the controller
> registers? So the controller CSRs should be accessible by separate local clock I
> believe.
> 
> Anyhow, please add this limitation (refclk dependency from host) in commit
> message.
> 
> [...]
> 
>>>> +	ret = phy_set_mode(stm32_pcie->phy, PHY_MODE_PCIE);
>>>
>>> Hmm, so PHY mode is common for both endpoint and host?
>>
>> Yes it is. We need to init the phy here because it is a clock source for the
>> PCIe core clk
>>
> 
> Clock source? Is it coming directly to PCIe or through RCC? There is no direct
> clock representation from PHY to PCIe in DT binding.

The core_clk is generated directly by the PLL in the COMBOPHY, gated by 
the RCC

> 
> - Mani
>