linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the perf tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z2DMD3WXW5Wn8vhd@x1>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 21:55:43 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Ruffalo Lavoisier <ruffalolavoisier@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the perf tree

On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:39:47AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnaldo,
> 
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 21:33:39 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > I can force push after the original author provides the Signed-off-by,
> > but for such a simple patch can we just keep things as-is?
> > 
> > Is that that what you're saying?
> 
> Yeah, hardly worth a rebase/rewrite.

So thanks for the report, I'll try and improve my automation practices :-\

- Arnaldo