linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: add generic parity calculation for u8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f9d4aeab-56a4-4935-96a3-50b9b3b5a1cc@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 05:10:06 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
 Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
 Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] bitops: add generic parity calculation for u8

On 12/17/24 00:41, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
>> I hope that both patches can be applied in one go to avoid a dependency.
>> I'd think the hwmon-tree is a tad more suitable, but I am also fine with
>> bitmap as long as both patches go in. What do you maintainers thing?
> 
> Second thought, we can ask I3C to take it. Together with the cleanups
> for the I3C drivers I would add then.
> 
> If this is not to your likings, then an immutable branch for I3C to pull
> in would be helpful, though.
> 

Anything is fine with me. No need for an immutable branch from my perspective.

Guenter