[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbcDwJaLmCa_YoP2zFw3fiWn-d1Q773jGh9kcVN8aWQKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 14:41:36 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul Kocialkowski <paulk@...-base.io>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, Paul Kocialkowski <contact@...lk.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: sunxi: Use minimal debouncing period as default
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 3:43 PM Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org> wrote:
> [Paul]
> > The pinctrl code supports an input-debounce device-tree property to set
> > a specific debouncing period and choose which clock source is most
> > relevant. However the property is specified in microseconds, which is
> > longer than the minimal period achievable from the high-frequency
> > oscillator without a pre-scaler.
>
> That can be fixed by introducing a new property with a ns resolution.
Perhaps, but I think a setting of 0 should just yield the minimum
resolution in this case, as apparently the debounce cannot be
turned off? This would also make sense to expose for
gpiod_set_debounce() as explained in my other mail.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists