linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: vmd: Fix spinlock usage on config access for RT kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241218160316.NHEIKDfT@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 17:03:16 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@...il.com>, lgoncalv@...hat.com,
	bhelgaas@...gle.com, jonathan.derrick@...ux.dev, kw@...ux.com,
	lpieralisi@...nel.org, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
	nirmal.patel@...ux.intel.com, robh@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: vmd: Fix spinlock usage on config access for RT
 kernel

On 2024-12-18 08:57:53 [-0700], Keith Busch wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 04:48:38PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2024-12-18 08:36:54 [-0700], Keith Busch wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 08:59:51PM +0900, Ryo Takakura wrote:
> > > > PCI config access is locked with pci_lock which serializes
> > > > pci_user/bus_write_config*() and pci_user/bus_read_config*().
> > > > The subsequently invoked vmd_pci_write() and vmd_pci_read() are also
> > > > serialized as they are only invoked by them respectively.
> > > > 
> > > > Remove cfg_lock which is taken by vmd_pci_write() and vmd_pci_read()
> > > > for their serialization as its already serialized by pci_lock.
> > > 
> > > That's only true if CONFIG_PCI_LOCKLESS_CONFIG isn't set, so pci_lock
> > > won't help with concurrent kernel config access in such a setup. I think
> > > the previous change to raw lock proposal was the correct approach.
> > 
> > I overlooked that. Wouldn't it make sense to let the vmd driver select
> > that option rather than adding/ having a lock for the same purpose?
> 
> The arch/x86/Kconfig always selects PCI_LOCKESS_CONFIG, so I don't think
> the vmd driver can require it be turned off. Besides, no need to punish
> all PCI access if only this device requires it be serialized.

Okay. That makes sense.

Sebastian