| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20241218165331.GF1155365@yaz-khff2.amd.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:53:31 -0500
From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, catalin.marinas@....com, mingo@...hat.com,
robin.murphy@....com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, bp@...en8.de,
rafael@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, tanxiaofei@...wei.com,
mawupeng1@...wei.com, tony.luck@...el.com, linmiaohe@...wei.com,
naoya.horiguchi@....com, james.morse@....com,
tongtiangen@...wei.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, will@...nel.org,
jarkko@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, justin.he@....com,
ardb@...nel.org, ying.huang@...el.com, ashish.kalra@....com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, lenb@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
robert.moore@...el.com, lvying6@...wei.com, xiexiuqi@...wei.com,
zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 3/3] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in
task work
On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 11:05:27AM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
> The memory uncorrected error could be signaled by asynchronous interrupt
> (specifically, SPI in arm64 platform), e.g. when an error is detected by
> a background scrubber, or signaled by synchronous exception
> (specifically, data abort exception in arm64 platform), e.g. when a CPU
> tries to access a poisoned cache line. Currently, both synchronous and
> asynchronous error use memory_failure_queue() to schedule
> memory_failure() to exectute in a kworker context.
>
> As a result, when a user-space process is accessing a poisoned data, a
> data abort is taken and the memory_failure() is executed in the kworker
> context, memory_failure():
>
> - will send wrong si_code by SIGBUS signal in early_kill mode, and
> - can not kill the user-space in some cases resulting a synchronous
> error infinite loop
>
> Issue 1: send wrong si_code in early_kill mode
>
> Since commit a70297d22132 ("ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as
> MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events")', the flag MF_ACTION_REQUIRED
> could be used to determine whether a synchronous exception occurs on
> ARM64 platform. When a synchronous exception is detected, the kernel is
> expected to terminate the current process which has accessed poisoned
> page. This is done by sending a SIGBUS signal with an error code
> BUS_MCEERR_AR, indicating an action-required machine check error on
> read.
>
> However, when kill_proc() is called to terminate the processes who have
> the poisoned page mapped, it sends the incorrect SIGBUS error code
> BUS_MCEERR_AO because the context in which it operates is not the one
> where the error was triggered.
>
> To reproduce this problem:
>
> #sysctl -w vm.memory_failure_early_kill=1
> vm.memory_failure_early_kill = 1
>
> # STEP2: inject an UCE error and consume it to trigger a synchronous error
> #einj_mem_uc single
> 0: single vaddr = 0xffffb0d75400 paddr = 4092d55b400
> injecting ...
> triggering ...
> signal 7 code 5 addr 0xffffb0d75000
> page not present
> Test passed
>
> The si_code (code 5) from einj_mem_uc indicates that it is BUS_MCEERR_AO
> error and it is not the fact.
>
> After this patch:
>
> # STEP1: enable early kill mode
> #sysctl -w vm.memory_failure_early_kill=1
> vm.memory_failure_early_kill = 1
> # STEP2: inject an UCE error and consume it to trigger a synchronous error
> #einj_mem_uc single
> 0: single vaddr = 0xffffb0d75400 paddr = 4092d55b400
> injecting ...
> triggering ...
> signal 7 code 4 addr 0xffffb0d75000
> page not present
> Test passed
>
> The si_code (code 4) from einj_mem_uc indicates that it is a BUS_MCEERR_AR
> error as we expected.
>
> Issue 2: a synchronous error infinite loop
>
> If a user-space process, e.g. devmem, accesses a poisoned page for which
> the HWPoison flag is set, kill_accessing_process() is called to send
> SIGBUS to current processs with error info. Because the memory_failure()
> is executed in the kworker context, it will just do nothing but return
> EFAULT. So, devmem will access the posioned page and trigger an
> exception again, resulting in a synchronous error infinite loop. Such
> exception loop may cause platform firmware to exceed some threshold and
> reboot when Linux could have recovered from this error.
>
> To reproduce this problem:
>
> # STEP 1: inject an UCE error, and kernel will set HWPosion flag for related page
> #einj_mem_uc single
> 0: single vaddr = 0xffffb0d75400 paddr = 4092d55b400
> injecting ...
> triggering ...
> signal 7 code 4 addr 0xffffb0d75000
> page not present
> Test passed
>
> # STEP 2: access the same page and it will trigger a synchronous error infinite loop
> devmem 0x4092d55b400
>
> To fix above two issues, queue memory_failure() as a task_work so that
> it runs in the context of the process that is actually consuming the
> poisoned data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Tested-by: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> include/acpi/ghes.h | 3 --
> include/linux/mm.h | 1 -
> mm/memory-failure.c | 13 -------
> 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index 106486bdfefc..70f2ee3ad1a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -467,28 +467,41 @@ static void ghes_clear_estatus(struct ghes *ghes,
> }
>
> /*
The "kernel-doc" format needs an opening "/**".
> - * Called as task_work before returning to user-space.
> - * Ensure any queued work has been done before we return to the context that
> - * triggered the notification.
> + * struct ghes_task_work - for synchronous RAS event
> + *
> + * @twork: callback_head for task work
> + * @pfn: page frame number of corrupted page
> + * @flags: work control flags
> + *
> + * Structure to pass task work to be handled before
> + * returning to user-space via task_work_add().
> */
> -static void ghes_kick_task_work(struct callback_head *head)
> +struct ghes_task_work {
> + struct callback_head twork;
> + u64 pfn;
> + int flags;
> +};
> +
> +static void memory_failure_cb(struct callback_head *twork)
> {
> - struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus;
> - struct ghes_estatus_node *estatus_node;
> - u32 node_len;
> + struct ghes_task_work *twcb = container_of(twork, struct ghes_task_work, twork);
> + int ret;
>
> - estatus_node = container_of(head, struct ghes_estatus_node, task_work);
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE))
> - memory_failure_queue_kick(estatus_node->task_work_cpu);
> + ret = memory_failure(twcb->pfn, twcb->flags);
> + gen_pool_free(ghes_estatus_pool, (unsigned long)twcb, sizeof(*twcb));
>
> - estatus = GHES_ESTATUS_FROM_NODE(estatus_node);
> - node_len = GHES_ESTATUS_NODE_LEN(cper_estatus_len(estatus));
> - gen_pool_free(ghes_estatus_pool, (unsigned long)estatus_node, node_len);
> + if (!ret || ret == -EHWPOISON || ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> + return;
> +
> + pr_err("%#llx: Sending SIGBUS to %s:%d due to hardware memory corruption\n",
> + twcb->pfn, current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
This is basically the same as the message in kill_proc(). Was there any
consideration to have a shared function? Maybe this could be a future
patch.
> + force_sig(SIGBUS);
> }
>
> static bool ghes_do_memory_failure(u64 physical_addr, int flags)
> {
> unsigned long pfn;
> + struct ghes_task_work *twcb;
Minor nit: A common preference I've seen is to order variable
declarations from longest->shortest line length.
But overall, looks okay to me.
Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Thanks,
Yazen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists