[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241218165444.GL2354@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 17:54:44 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/172] 6.12.6-rc1 review
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 08:53:39AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> The fix is not yet in mainline, meaning the offending patch now results
> in the same build failure there.
It's a test, to see if anybody except the build robots actually gives a
damn about i386 :-)
/me runs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists