lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6763045f.df0a0220.10df6b.5428@mx.google.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 18:20:27 +0100
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	upstream@...oha.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: add ID for eMMC for EN7581

On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 05:04:03PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 10:11:33AM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > Add ID for eMMC for EN7581. This is to control clock selection of eMMC
> > between 200MHz and 150MHz.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Changes v2:
> > - Drop additional define for EN7581_NUM_CLOCKS
> > 
> >  include/dt-bindings/clock/en7523-clk.h | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/en7523-clk.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/en7523-clk.h
> > index 717d23a5e5ae..c4f8a161b981 100644
> > --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/en7523-clk.h
> > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/en7523-clk.h
> > @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
> >  #define EN7523_CLK_CRYPTO	6
> >  #define EN7523_CLK_PCIE		7
> >  
> 
> Why the gap?
>

It's only present in en7523 so maybe it's a good idea to have the gap to
make that more clear?

> > +#define EN7581_CLK_EMMC		8
> > +
> >  #define EN7523_NUM_CLOCKS	8
> 
> Can you delete this please? Your changelog appears to suggest you did,
> but I see it still.

Yes sure didn't want to change this too much to cause regression
downstream if anyone was using it. Will drop in a dedicated patch when I
will post v3 tomorrow.

-- 
	Ansuel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ