[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a1dfae2-d76c-4b78-a058-fce9d565dab6@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 18:48:46 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/172] 6.12.6-rc1 review
On 18. 12. 24, 17:54, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 08:53:39AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
>> The fix is not yet in mainline, meaning the offending patch now results
>> in the same build failure there.
Yes, as I wrote in the aforementioned message :).
> It's a test, to see if anybody except the build robots actually gives a
> damn about i386 :-)
This is not much of a robot -- openSUSE still provides 386. As a port
now. I failed to destroy that port in past several attempts :P -- there
were still users.
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists