lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241218220453.203069-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 14:04:53 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
	Blake Jones <blakejones@...gle.com>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
	Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
	Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>,
	linux-modules@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf tools: Fixup end address of modules

In machine__create_module(), it reads /proc/modules to get a list of
modules in the system.  The file shows the start address (of text) and
the size of the module so it uses the info to reconstruct system memory
maps for symbol resolution.

But module memory consists of multiple segments and they can be
scaterred.  Currently perf tools assume they are contiguous and see some
overlaps.  This can confuse the tool when it finds a map containing a
given address.

As we mostly care about the function symbols in the text segment, it can
fixup the size or end address of modules when there's an overlap.  We
can use maps__fixup_end() which updates the end address using the start
address of the next map.

Ideally it should be able to track other segments (like data/rodata),
but that would require some changes in /proc/modules IMHO.

Reported-by: Blake Jones <blakejones@...gle.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>
Cc: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Cc: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-modules@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/machine.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
index 27d5345d2b307a97..8bb34689e3ceeec4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
@@ -1468,6 +1468,8 @@ static int machine__create_modules(struct machine *machine)
 	if (modules__parse(modules, machine, machine__create_module))
 		return -1;
 
+	maps__fixup_end(machine__kernel_maps(machine));
+
 	if (!machine__set_modules_path(machine))
 		return 0;
 
-- 
2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ