linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b2c40d56-9ee1-484c-bfbf-d1c4a45594a1@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:19:48 +0530
From: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
        rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com,
        broonie@...nel.org, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
        Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/109] 6.6.67-rc1 review

Hi Greg,

On 17/12/24 22:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.67 release.
> There are 109 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:05:03 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

This below commit is causing perf build failure, could you please drop this:

 > James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
 >     libperf: evlist: Fix --cpu argument on hybrid platform

evlist.c: In function '__perf_evlist__propagate_maps':
evlist.c:55:21: error: implicit declaration of function 
'perf_cpu_map__is_empty'; did you mean 'perf_cpu_map__empty'? 
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    55 |                 if (perf_cpu_map__is_empty(evsel->cpus)) {
       |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       |                     perf_cpu_map__empty



Thanks,
Harshit