[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+E=qVcU9V+8LZ0Xnh+oDROVf8H99t_kiku7iSdXTHP43d9E_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 22:35:53 -0800
From: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Roman Beranek <me@...y.cz>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: sunxi: Export PLL_VIDEO_2X and PLL_MIPI
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 1:15 PM Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:00:45 -0800
> Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 11:33 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 09:34:57PM -0800, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> > > > These will be used to explicitly select TCON0 clock parent in dts
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: ca1170b69968 ("clk: sunxi-ng: a64: force select PLL_MIPI in TCON0 mux")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.h | 2 --
> > > > include/dt-bindings/clock/sun50i-a64-ccu.h | 2 +
> >
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > > You cannot combine these changes.
> >
> > The patch basically moves defines out from ccu-sun50i-a64.h to
> > sun50i-a64-ccu.h. How do I split the change without introducing
> > compilation failure?
>
> You can just have the binding part first, adding the (same) definition
> to the binding headers. As long as the #define's are not conflicting,
> this is fine.
> Then remove the now redundant definitions in the kernel headers, with a
> subsequent patch.
Thanks for the suggestion! I'll address it in v2.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists