linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] vhost: Add the cgroup related function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACLfguWtkt6xXs5dJygyEGQwztFdC8BrT3KOr1wpGjSraFL8HA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 16:45:46 +0800
From: Cindy Lu <lulu@...hat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: jasowang@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com, michael.christie@...cle.com, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] vhost: Add the cgroup related function

On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 1:53 AM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 12:41:42AM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
> >Add back the previously removed cgroup function to support the kthread
>
> nit: missing . at the end
>
will fix this
> >The biggest change for this part is in vhost_attach_cgroups() and
> >vhost_attach_task_to_cgroups().
>
> It's not clear what the big change is, is there a piece missing?
>
sure, I will rewrite this part to make it more clear
Thanks
cindy
> >
> >The old function was remove in
>
> s/remove/removed
>
> BTW which is the old function?
>
I will add this information
Thanks
cindy
> >commit 6e890c5d5021 ("vhost: use vhost_tasks for worker threads")
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@...hat.com>
> >---
> > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> >index 1feba29abf95..812dfd218bc2 100644
> >--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> >+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> >@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> > #include <linux/kthread.h>
> >+#include <linux/cgroup.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/sort.h>
> > #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
> >@@ -620,6 +621,38 @@ long vhost_dev_check_owner(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_dev_check_owner);
> >
> >+struct vhost_attach_cgroups_struct {
> >+      struct vhost_work work;
> >+      struct task_struct *owner;
> >+      int ret;
> >+};
> >+
> >+static void vhost_attach_cgroups_work(struct vhost_work *work)
> >+{
> >+      struct vhost_attach_cgroups_struct *s;
> >+
> >+      s = container_of(work, struct vhost_attach_cgroups_struct, work);
> >+      s->ret = cgroup_attach_task_all(s->owner, current);
> >+}
> >+
> >+static int vhost_attach_task_to_cgroups(struct vhost_worker *worker)
>
> This function looks renamed, should we mention in the commit
> description?
>
> >+{
> >+      struct vhost_flush_struct flush;
> >+      struct vhost_attach_cgroups_struct attach;
> >+
> >+      attach.owner = current;
> >+
> >+      vhost_work_init(&attach.work, vhost_attach_cgroups_work);
> >+      vhost_worker_queue(worker, &attach.work);
> >+
> >+      init_completion(&flush.wait_event);
> >+      vhost_work_init(&flush.work, vhost_flush_work);
> >+      vhost_worker_queue(worker, &flush.work);
> >+      wait_for_completion(&flush.wait_event);
>
> IIUC this block is the old "vhost_dev_flush", right?
>
> Maybe we should mention also that in the commit description.
>
sure, will add these informations
Thanks
cindy
> >+
> >+      return attach.ret;
> >+}
> >+
> > /* Caller should have device mutex */
> > bool vhost_dev_has_owner(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> > {
> >--
> >2.45.0
> >
>