[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f5e8d07-d459-7a8e-844e-6f1b432763fe@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 16:15:34 +0200 (EET)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.ibm.com>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] PCI/AER: Add prefixes to printouts
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 03:53:58PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > Only part of the AER diagnostic printouts use "AER:" prefix because
> > they use low-level pci_printk() directly to allow selecting level.
> >
> > Add "AER:" prefix to lines that are printed with pci_printk().
>
> Can we please include the "HW_ERR" prefix also? IMO, it would make the
> kernel messages more consistent if all hardware error info had it.
While I'm not against your suggestion, it doesn't belong into this patch
as there are other lines beyond those touched in this patch that would
need to have HW_ERR as well.
I think I'll just drop this patch from this series and move it into the
pci_printk() series to avoid the inter-series conflict. Adding the HW_ERR
change would conflict badly with Karolina Stolarek's series so I'm not
sure if I want to pursue that change at this point (it's only my todo
list so it won't get forgotten).
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists