linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Migrate PCI Endpoint Subsystem tests to Kselftest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241219155504.GA309825@rocinante>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:55:04 +0900
From: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
	shuah@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Migrate PCI Endpoint Subsystem tests to Kselftest

Hello,

[...]
> > Applied to selftests, thank you!
> > 
> > [01/04] PCI: qcom-ep: Mark BAR0/BAR2 as 64bit BARs and BAR1/BAR3 as RESERVED
> >         https://git.kernel.org/pci/pci/c/71ae1c3a342c
> > 
> > [02/04] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Fix the return value of IOCTL
> >         https://git.kernel.org/pci/pci/c/7908208a2f6a
> > 
> > [03/04] selftests: Move PCI Endpoint tests from tools/pci to Kselftests
> >         https://git.kernel.org/pci/pci/c/5c892b60e4c6
> > 
> > [04/04] selftests: pci_endpoint: Migrate to Kselftest framework
> >         https://git.kernel.org/pci/pci/c/62f966e676b5
> > 
> > 	Krzysztof
> 
> I'm a bit surprised that this series was picked up,
> since as you could see earlier in this same thread:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20241219000112.GE1444967@rocinante/T/#m7bb0e624a4bf88f5cc13dc3804972c4fa9a79bcd
> 
> Mani suggested that my patch (which conflicts with this),
> should be picked up first.
> 
> Is there a reason for the sudden chance of plans?

No, no change to the plan here.

There were some mixed signals between the mailing list, IRC and
the Patchwork queue.  But I will proceed as planned there.

> Please advice on how to proceed.

I will pick your patch and drop Mani's series.  Mani told me on IRC that he
plans to work on it a bit more.

	Krzysztof