lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173462514608.189443.5339636221433842657.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 16:19:06 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, 
 Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, 
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, 
 Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, 
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 treapking@...omium.org, yuanhsinte@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: disable buffer pre-allocation

On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 18:53:02 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Chromebooks based on Mediatek MT8195 or MT8188, the audio frontend
> (AFE) is limited to accessing a very small window (1 MiB) of memory,
> which is described as a reserved memory region in the device tree.
> 
> On these two platforms, the maximum buffer size is given as 512 KiB.
> The MediaTek common code uses the same value for preallocations. This
> means that only the first two PCM substreams get preallocations, and
> then the whole space is exhausted, barring any other substreams from
> working. Since the substreams used are not always the first two, this
> means audio won't work correctly.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: mediatek: disable buffer pre-allocation
      commit: 32c9c06adb5b157ef259233775a063a43746d699

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ