[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6xubvdnyo4otwanapxersipmae4uuwkvple2jaxyuu5ucepjju@kl6lhbde4ney>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 00:00:23 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>, Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>,
Roxana Bradescu <roxabee@...gle.com>, bjorn.andersson@....qualcomm.com,
Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@...dia.com>, D Scott Phillips <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: cputype: Add comments about Qualcomm Kryo
5XX and 6XX cores
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 01:11:10PM -0800, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> As tested on one example of a Qualcomm Kryo 5XX CPU [1] and one
> example of a Qualcomm Kryo 6XX CPU [2], we don't need any extra MIDR
> definitions for the cores in those processors. Add comments to make it
> clear that these IDs weren't forgotten and just aren't needed.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/l5rqbbxn6hktlcxooolkvi5n3arkht6zzhrvdjf6kis322nsup@5hsrak4cgteq/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/tx7vtur7yea6ruefrkpkccqptahgmxnsrudwdz5uzcfxnng25b@afrr5bmdk2xa/
>
>
> Suggested-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists