[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <etci547cjykqlqfswhkzdbdfx7cuyrszzswxv2qaghzu2fnu3y@fgitftlhe3oh>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 01:46:39 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Jun Nie <jun.nie@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 15/15] drm/msm/dpu: Enable quad-pipe for DSC and
dual-DSI case
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 03:49:33PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> Request 4 mixers and 4 DSC for the case that both dual-DSI and DSC are
> enabled. We prefer to use 4 pipes for dual DSI case for it is power optimal
> for DSC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h | 6 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h | 3 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 2 +-
> 7 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> index bad75af4e50ab..3c51c199f3e05 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static int dpu_crtc_get_lm_crc(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> struct dpu_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> struct dpu_crtc_mixer *m;
> - u32 crcs[CRTC_DUAL_MIXERS];
> + u32 crcs[CRTC_QUAD_MIXERS];
>
> int rc = 0;
> int i;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h
> index d1bb3f84fe440..ce41fb364f3db 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h
> @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ struct dpu_crtc_state {
>
> bool bw_control;
> bool bw_split_vote;
> - struct drm_rect lm_bounds[CRTC_DUAL_MIXERS];
> + struct drm_rect lm_bounds[CRTC_QUAD_MIXERS];
>
> uint64_t input_fence_timeout_ns;
>
> @@ -218,10 +218,10 @@ struct dpu_crtc_state {
>
> /* HW Resources reserved for the crtc */
> u32 num_mixers;
> - struct dpu_crtc_mixer mixers[CRTC_DUAL_MIXERS];
> + struct dpu_crtc_mixer mixers[CRTC_QUAD_MIXERS];
>
> u32 num_ctls;
> - struct dpu_hw_ctl *hw_ctls[CRTC_DUAL_MIXERS];
> + struct dpu_hw_ctl *hw_ctls[CRTC_QUAD_MIXERS];
>
> enum dpu_crtc_crc_source crc_source;
> int crc_frame_skip_count;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> index 96d06db3e4be5..6e54ddeaffacd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
> #define MAX_PHYS_ENCODERS_PER_VIRTUAL \
> (MAX_H_TILES_PER_DISPLAY * NUM_PHYS_ENCODER_TYPES)
>
> -#define MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC 2
> +#define MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC 4
>
> #define IDLE_SHORT_TIMEOUT 1
>
> @@ -664,15 +664,19 @@ static struct msm_display_topology dpu_encoder_get_topology(
>
> /* Datapath topology selection
> *
> - * Dual display
> + * Dual display without DSC
> * 2 LM, 2 INTF ( Split display using 2 interfaces)
> *
> + * Dual display with DSC
> + * 4 LM, 2 INTF ( Split display using 2 interfaces)
> + *
> * Single display
> * 1 LM, 1 INTF
> * 2 LM, 1 INTF (stream merge to support high resolution interfaces)
> *
> * Add dspps to the reservation requirements if ctm is requested
> */
> +
> if (intf_count == 2)
> topology.num_lm = 2;
> else if (!dpu_kms->catalog->caps->has_3d_merge)
> @@ -691,10 +695,20 @@ static struct msm_display_topology dpu_encoder_get_topology(
> * 2 DSC encoders, 2 layer mixers and 1 interface
> * this is power optimal and can drive up to (including) 4k
> * screens
> + * But for dual display case, we prefer 4 layer mixers. Because
> + * the resolution is always high in the case and 4 DSCs are more
> + * power optimal.
> */
> - topology.num_dsc = 2;
> - topology.num_lm = 2;
> - topology.num_intf = 1;
> +
> + if (intf_count == 2) {
> + topology.num_dsc = 4;
> + topology.num_lm = 4;
> + topology.num_intf = 2;
> + } else {
> + topology.num_dsc = 2;
> + topology.num_lm = 2;
> + topology.num_intf = 1;
Why is it only enabled for the DSC case? Also I'd like to point out
platforms like sm7150 or msm8998 which have only 2 DSC blocks. The
condition here needs more work to work with those platforms too.
> + }
> }
>
> return topology;
> @@ -2195,8 +2209,8 @@ static void dpu_encoder_helper_reset_mixers(struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys_enc)
> struct dpu_hw_mixer_cfg mixer;
> int i, num_lm;
> struct dpu_global_state *global_state;
> - struct dpu_hw_blk *hw_lm[2];
> - struct dpu_hw_mixer *hw_mixer[2];
> + struct dpu_hw_blk *hw_lm[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
> + struct dpu_hw_mixer *hw_mixer[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
> struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctl = phys_enc->hw_ctl;
>
> memset(&mixer, 0, sizeof(mixer));
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h
> index 63f09857025c2..d378a990cc0fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h
> @@ -302,7 +302,8 @@ static inline enum dpu_3d_blend_mode dpu_encoder_helper_get_3d_blend_mode(
>
> /* Use merge_3d unless DSC MERGE topology is used */
> if (phys_enc->split_role == ENC_ROLE_SOLO &&
> - dpu_cstate->num_mixers == CRTC_DUAL_MIXERS &&
> + (dpu_cstate->num_mixers == CRTC_DUAL_MIXERS ||
> + dpu_cstate->num_mixers == CRTC_QUAD_MIXERS) &&
Misaligned. Also isn't it enough to check that num_mixers != 1?
> !dpu_encoder_use_dsc_merge(phys_enc->parent))
> return BLEND_3D_H_ROW_INT;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> index 3ab79092a7f25..d9cc84b081b1f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> #define DPU_MAX_IMG_HEIGHT 0x3fff
>
> #define CRTC_DUAL_MIXERS 2
Do we still need this define?
> +#define CRTC_QUAD_MIXERS 4
>
> #define MAX_XIN_COUNT 16
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h
> index 27ef0771da5d2..1fe21087a141a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h
> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@
> #endif
>
> #define STAGES_PER_PLANE 2
> -#define PIPES_PER_PLANE 2
> #define PIPES_PER_STAGE 2
> +#define PIPES_PER_PLANE (STAGES_PER_PLANE * STAGES_PER_PLANE)
This is incorrect.
> #ifndef DPU_MAX_DE_CURVES
> #define DPU_MAX_DE_CURVES 3
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> index 57ccb73c45683..b5c1ad2a75594 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> @@ -1474,7 +1474,7 @@ static void _dpu_plane_atomic_disable(struct drm_plane *plane)
> trace_dpu_plane_disable(DRMID(plane), false,
> pstate->pipe[i].multirect_mode);
>
> - if (pipe->sspp && i == 1) {
> + if (pipe->sspp && pipe->multirect_index == DPU_SSPP_RECT_1) {
Separate change, please. Also I'm not sure how does that work with the
shared SSPP case that I pointed to in one of the previous replies.
> pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
> pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
>
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists