[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z2OpylDlhLXoo3dt@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 21:06:18 -0800
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <jgg@...dia.com>, <kevin.tian@...el.com>, <will@...nel.org>,
<corbet@....net>, <joro@...tes.org>, <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
<robin.murphy@....com>, <dwmw2@...radead.org>, <shuah@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
<jean-philippe@...aro.org>, <mdf@...nel.org>, <mshavit@...gle.com>,
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, <smostafa@...gle.com>,
<ddutile@...hat.com>, <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, <patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/14] iommufd/viommu: Add iommufd_viommu_get_vdev_id
helper
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 10:05:53AM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 12/18/24 13:00, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > This is a reverse search v.s. iommufd_viommu_find_dev, as drivers may want
> > to convert a struct device pointer (physical) to its virtual device ID for
> > an event injection to the user space VM.
> >
> > Again, this avoids exposing more core structures to the drivers, than the
> > iommufd_viommu alone.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen<nicolinc@...dia.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/iommufd.h | 8 ++++++++
> > drivers/iommu/iommufd/driver.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/iommufd.h b/include/linux/iommufd.h
> > index b082676c9e43..ac1f1897d290 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/iommufd.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/iommufd.h
> > @@ -190,6 +190,8 @@ struct iommufd_object *_iommufd_object_alloc(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx,
> > enum iommufd_object_type type);
> > struct device *iommufd_viommu_find_dev(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
> > unsigned long vdev_id);
> > +unsigned long iommufd_viommu_get_vdev_id(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
> > + struct device *dev);
>
> Hi Nicolin,
>
> This series overall looks good to me. But I have a question that might
> be irrelevant to this series itself.
>
> The iommufd provides both IOMMUFD_OBJ_DEVICE and IOMMUFD_OBJ_VDEVICE
> objects. What is the essential difference between these two from
> userspace's perspective?
A quick answer is an IOMMUFD_OBJ_DEVICE being a host physical
device and an IOMMUFD_OBJ_VDEVICE being an IOMMUFD_OBJ_DEVICE
related to IOMMUFD_OBJ_VIOMMU. Two of them can be seen in two
different layers. May refer to this graph:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/userspace-api/iommufd.rst?h=v6.13-rc3#n150
> And, which object ID should the IOMMU device
> driver provide when reporting other events in the future?
>
> Currently, the IOMMUFD uAPI reports IOMMUFD_OBJ_DEVICE in the page
> fault message, and IOMMUFD_OBJ_VDEVICE (if I understand it correctly) in
> the vIRQ message. It will be more future-proof if this could be defined
> clearly.
A vIRQ is actually reported per-vIOMMU in this design. Although
in the this series the SMMU driver seems to report a per-device
vIRQ, it internally converts the vDEVICE to a virtual device ID
and packs the virtual device ID into a per-vIOMMU event:
+/**
+ * struct iommu_virq_arm_smmuv3 - ARM SMMUv3 Virtual IRQ
+ * (IOMMU_VIRQ_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3)
+ * @evt: 256-bit ARM SMMUv3 Event record, little-endian.
+ * (Refer to "7.3 Event records" in SMMUv3 HW Spec)
+ *
+ * StreamID field reports a virtual device ID. To receive a virtual IRQ for a
+ * device, a vDEVICE must be allocated via IOMMU_VDEVICE_ALLOC.
+ */
+struct iommu_virq_arm_smmuv3 {
+ __aligned_le64 evt[4];
};
Thanks
Nicolin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists