[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241219062802.GC19782@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 07:28:02 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...nel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>,
Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@...adcom.com>,
Shivasharan S <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@...adcom.com>,
Chandrakanth patil <chandrakanth.patil@...adcom.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Nilesh Javali <njavali@...vell.com>,
GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com,
Don Brace <don.brace@...rochip.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Sridhar Balaraman <sbalaraman@...allelwireless.com>,
"brookxu.cn" <brookxu.cn@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
storagedev@...rochip.com, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] blk-mq: issue warning when offlining hctx with
online isolcpus
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 07:29:43PM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> When we offlining a hardware context which also serves isolcpus mapped
> to it, any IO issued by the isolcpus will stall as there is nothing
> which handles the interrupts etc.
>
> This configuration/setup is not supported at this point thus just issue
> a warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...nel.org>
> ---
> block/blk-mq.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index de15c0c76f874a2a863b05a23e0f3dba20cb6488..f9af0f5dd6aac8da855777acf2ffc61128f15a74 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -3619,6 +3619,45 @@ static bool blk_mq_hctx_has_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> return data.has_rq;
> }
>
> +static void blk_mq_hctx_check_isolcpus_online(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, unsigned int cpu)
Please avoid the overly long line here.
> +{
> + const struct cpumask *hk_mask;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!housekeeping_enabled(HK_TYPE_MANAGED_IRQ))
> + return;
> +
> + hk_mask = housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_MANAGED_IRQ);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < hctx->nr_ctx; i++) {
> + struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = hctx->ctxs[i];
> +
> + if (ctx->cpu == cpu)
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * Check if this context has at least one online
> + * housekeeping CPU in this case the hardware context is
> + * usable.
But here you;re not even using up all 80 characters for the comment.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists