linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/172] 6.12.6-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f8083d59-7f38-4f12-9b53-1ad0d2826a4a@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:05:55 +0530
From: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
        rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com,
        broonie@...nel.org, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
        Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/172] 6.12.6-rc1 review

Hi Greg,

On 17/12/24 22:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.6 release.
> There are 172 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:05:03 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

We now made tests for 6.12.y stable rc testing ready.

No problems seen on x86_64 and aarch64 with our testing.
(Boot/ Install/ LTP so far)

We do see some problems with failing kselftests, will investigate them 
and report them here. They are not specific to 6.12.6, most of them were 
reproducible on 6.12.5, but we will have to look at all of the failing 
kselftests before reporting.

Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>

Thanks,
Harshit