[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241219085515.GB26551@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 09:55:15 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
willy@...radead.org, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, hannes@...xchg.org, mjguzik@...il.com,
oliver.sang@...el.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
david@...hat.com, peterx@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com,
dave@...olabs.net, paulmck@...nel.org, brauner@...nel.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, hdanton@...a.com, hughd@...gle.com,
lokeshgidra@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com, jannh@...gle.com,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, souravpanda@...gle.com,
pasha.tatashin@...een.com, klarasmodin@...il.com, corbet@....net,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/16] mm: replace vm_lock and detached flag with a
reference count
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 11:29:23AM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> Yeah, I think we can simply do this:
>
> vms_complete_munmap_vmas
> vms_clear_ptes
> remove_vma
> vma_mark_detached
> mmap_write_downgrade
>
> If my assumption is incorrect, assertion inside vma_mark_detached()
> should trigger. I tried a quick test and so far nothing exploded.
I think that would be unfortunate and could cause regressions. I think
we want to keep vms_clear_ptes() under the read-lock.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists