lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <axscykf5n2lutd7pqljaiyyfwgw2vuh7knnxcv6vlphu2fxefp@7kmgimahqop4>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:50:54 +0100
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, 
	Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Microchip CoreI2C driver fixes

Hi Conor,

On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 12:07:39PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> 
> Yo,
> 
> Here's a v2 with one of the minor items pointed out by Andi resolved and
> a new patch for an issue fixed in the months since v1, plus some minor
> checkpatch things that I seem to have missed on v1. On v1 there was
> unresolved discussion with Wolfram, but it has been two months without a
> response so I am sending this v2 in an attempt to make progress.
> 
> Cheers,
> Conor.
> 
> v2:
> - remove extra () Andi pointed out
> - fix some {} use that defied the coding style
> - new patch for "ghost detections"
> 
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20240930-uneasy-dorsal-1acda9227b0d@spud/
> 
> CC: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> CC: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>
> CC: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
> CC: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
> CC: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> CC: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> 
> Conor Dooley (2):
>   i2c: microchip-core: actually use repeated sends
>   i2c: microchip-core: fix "ghost" detections

Thanks for your patches, they look fine to me. For self reference
I'm going to add

Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>

to both of them. If you don't mind, I'm going to queue them up
for next week, as I'm not accepting anymore Fixes for this week
(unless they are trivial).

Thank you,
Andi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ