[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af251ba3-660b-4281-84aa-a715eb83039b@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 13:28:59 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, upstream@...oha.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: clock: drop NUM_CLOCKS define for
EN7581
On 19/12/2024 13:18, Christian Marangi wrote:
> Drop NUM_CLOCKS define for EN7581 include. This is not a binding and
> should not be placed here. Value is derived internally in the user
> driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes v3:
> - Add this patch
>
> include/dt-bindings/clock/en7523-clk.h | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/en7523-clk.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/en7523-clk.h
> index c4f8a161b981..edfa64045f52 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/en7523-clk.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/en7523-clk.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,4 @@
>
> #define EN7581_CLK_EMMC 8
>
> -#define EN7523_NUM_CLOCKS 8
Are you sure your patchset bisects?
Also better to arrange cleanups before new clocks added, so lack of
conflict between number of clocks and new clock ID is obvious.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists