linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 00/28] module: Use RCU instead of RCU-sched.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241220174731.514432-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 18:41:14 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>,
	Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 00/28] module: Use RCU instead of RCU-sched.

Hi,

This is an updated version of the inital post after PeterZ made me aware
that there are users outside of the module directory.
The goal is replace the mix auf rcu_read_lock(), rcu_read_lock_sched()
and preempt_disable() with just rcu_read_lock().

I've splitted it into smaller chunks which can be applied/ reviewed
independently. I'm just not sure about the cfi patch (28/28) so I added
just a comment instead.

v1…v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241205215102.hRywUW2A@linutronix.de/
  - Splitted into smaller patches.
  - Converted all users.

Sebastian