| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20241220-dt-docs-refresh-v3-1-999754568b87@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 20:25:19 +0100 From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> Subject: [PATCH v3] docs: dt: Make references and mention kernel abstractions This document is named "Linux and Devicetree" so I think we should write a bit more about how the device tree fits into the Linux kernel frameworks these days after we have created the fwnode and swnode. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> --- These docs are old and outdated and need to be edited to reflect the current situation. --- Changes in v3: - Resend because v2 seems to be missed or ignored. - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230505-dt-docs-refresh-v2-1-56bf359c53b4@linaro.org --- ChangeLog v2->v3: - Rebase on v6.13-rc1 - Resend because this seems to keep being ignored. ChangeLog v1->v2: - Spelling mistakes - Resend because nothing happens --- Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst b/Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst index 0717426856b229be1c52efc79b18dbc617d4c92f..32dca4ca4384502fe2065efe650daf517435763c 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.rst @@ -75,7 +75,44 @@ out of mainline (nios) have some level of DT support. If you haven't already read the Device Tree Usage\ [1]_ page, then go read it now. It's okay, I'll wait.... -2.1 High Level View +2.1 Linux Kernel Firmware Abstractions +-------------------------------------- + +The Linux kernel supports several different hardware description +frameworks and DT is just one of them. The closest sibling is the +:ref:`Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/index.rst ACPI` +DSDT (Differentiated System Description Table). + +To make it possible to write a device driver that will adapt to DT +or other hardware description models, the kernel has grown some +abstractions, first and foremost the firmware node API, exposing +device properties. The firmware node "fwnode" internals can be found +in ``<linux/fwnode.h>`` while the device driver-facing API can be +found in ``<linux/property.h>``. The idea is that if a driver is using +the firmware node API, it should be trivial to support DT and ACPI +DSDT alike in the same driver. + +The fwnode framework also makes it possible to modify and extend the +Linux in-kernel model with software-managed nodes "swnodes" to apply +quirks or manage registration of devices that cannot be handled any +other way. This API can also be found in ``<linux/property.h>``. + +Further, when the DT core register devices these need to fold into the +Linux device driver model, which essentially means that some kind of +``struct device`` has to be created to match a corresponding +``struct device_driver``. This API can be explored in +detail in :ref:`Documentation/driver-api/driver-model/index.rst the driver API documentation` +but what you need to know is that the Linux DT parser code will on its +own mostly spawn platform devices and AMBA devices on the platform +and AMBA bus respectively, and apart from that it will augment devices +spawn on other buses where applicable. + +Every Linux kernel subsystem that want to supply additional data to +detected devices using the device tree, or that want to provide +resources to other devices in the DT, will need to implement calls into +the DT abstractions. + +2.2 High Level View ------------------- The most important thing to understand is that the DT is simply a data structure that describes the hardware. There is nothing magical about @@ -97,7 +134,7 @@ Linux uses DT data for three major purposes: 2) runtime configuration, and 3) device population. -2.2 Platform Identification +2.3 Platform Identification --------------------------- First and foremost, the kernel will use data in the DT to identify the specific machine. In a perfect world, the specific platform shouldn't @@ -180,7 +217,7 @@ However, this approach does not take into account the priority of the compatible list, and probably should be avoided for new architecture support. -2.3 Runtime configuration +2.4 Runtime configuration ------------------------- In most cases, a DT will be the sole method of communicating data from firmware to the kernel, so also gets used to pass in runtime and @@ -217,7 +254,7 @@ On ARM, the function setup_machine_fdt() is responsible for early scanning of the device tree after selecting the correct machine_desc that supports the board. -2.4 Device population +2.5 Device population --------------------- After the board has been identified, and after the early configuration data has been parsed, then kernel initialization can proceed in the normal --- base-commit: 40384c840ea1944d7c5a392e8975ed088ecf0b37 change-id: 20230505-dt-docs-refresh-515edbdbbd01 Best regards, -- Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists