[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241220141943.8e63906eb73da5f29979eae7@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 14:19:43 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Phillip Lougher <phillip@...ashfs.org.uk>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] squashfs: Convert squashfs_fill_page() to take a
folio
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 18:42:57 +0000 Phillip Lougher <phillip@...ashfs.org.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On 20/12/2024 18:24, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 06:19:35PM +0000, Phillip Lougher wrote:
> >>> @@ -398,6 +400,7 @@ void squashfs_copy_cache(struct folio *folio,
> >>> bytes -= PAGE_SIZE, offset += PAGE_SIZE) {
> >>> struct folio *push_folio;
> >>> size_t avail = buffer ? min(bytes, PAGE_SIZE) : 0;
> >>> + bool filled = false;
> >
> > ahh, this should have been filled = true (if the folio is already
> > uptodate, then it has been filled). Or maybe it'd be less confusing if
> > we named the bool 'uptodate'.
> >
> > Would you like me to submit a fresh set of patches, or will you fix
> > these two bugs up?
> >
> > Thanks for testing!
>
> Np.
>
> Andrew Morton is kindly handling Squashfs patch submission to Linus for me,
> and so I can't easily fix them up.
>
> Andrew what you like done here please?
I think a v2 series would be best, please.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists