[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87frmiwx07.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 09:59:20 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: "Michael Walle" <mwalle@...nel.org>
Cc: "Tudor Ambarus" <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, "Renjun Wang"
<renjunw0@...mail.com>, "Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@...nel.org>, "Richard
Weinberger" <richard@....at>, "Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@...com>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: extend description of size member of
struct flash_info
>> >> TBH I'd be perfectly fine (and prefer) a dedicated member, because
>> >> code clarity is IMO more important than memory footprint today.
>
> But that would have meant more code churn, because the default
> should be the new method. Thus we'd have to change all the old
> entries.
Oh yeah, I feel it would be a patchset on its own. I'm just mentioning
it if someone has the willingness some day. As for now, it is important
to properly document how we use the fields.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists