[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h66yafqv.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:03:04 +0100
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Levi Zim
<rsworktech@...look.com>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, John
Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman
<horms@...nel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] Fix NPE discovered by running bpf kselftest
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com> writes:
>> Took the series for a run, and it does solve crash, but I'm getting
>> additional failures:
>
> Thanks! I'm guessing those tests were failing even without the patch
> though right?
Correct.
test_sockmap did however pass the full suite in 6.12. So, something
changed with the addition of [1].
I guess:
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
can be added to this series, and not crashing is nice, but it would be
interesting to know how it got there.
Björn
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241106222520.527076-1-zijianzhang@bytedance.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists