linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] net: stmmac: dwmac-nuvoton: Add dwmac glue for Nuvoton MA35 family

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c800e544-82af-43d3-b07a-e7b1a4028330@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 11:59:54 +0100
From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
To: Joey Lu <a0987203069@...il.com>
CC: <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
	<ychuang3@...oton.com>, <schung@...oton.com>, <yclu4@...oton.com>,
	<peppe.cavallaro@...com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>, <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	<richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] net: stmmac: dwmac-nuvoton: Add dwmac glue for
 Nuvoton MA35 family

On 12/20/24 08:07, Joey Lu wrote:
> Dear Przemek,
> 
> Thank you for your reply.

sure :)
please also configure your email to write replies as plain-text, instead
of HTML

I also forgot to say, that you should have target this series for the
net-next (--subject-prefix for git-send-email)

Please also note that your v2 should wait to be send in the new year,
as we will begin the Winter Break for netdev ML in a moment.

>>> +/* 2000ps is mapped to 0 ~ 0xF */
>>> +#define PATH_DELAY_DEC      134
>>
>> would be great to previx your macros by NVT_
> Got it.
>>
>> why 134 and not 125?
> 
> The interval is confirmed to be 134. The mapping is as follows:
> 
> |0000| = 0.00 ns
> |0001| = 0.13 ns
> |0010| = 0.27 ns
> ...
> |1111| = 2.00 ns

thanks, that's correct, sorry for confusion