linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm,psci: Allow S2RAM power

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z2V5WMN5aHQwQlNH@bogus>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 14:04:08 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm,psci: Allow S2RAM power_state
 parameter description

On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 02:57:34PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 20.12.2024 2:55 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > 
> > Please take a look at the preconditions for both the calls. They are
> > different.
> 
> Which is *precisely* why I want to tell the OS that it's a S2RAM state,
> so that different actions can be taken in peripheral device drivers.

Yes we do that for SYSTEM_SUSPEND. And CPU_SUSPEND is not SYSTEM_SUSPEND
hence 2 different APIs. My NACK still stands.

--
Regards,
Sudeep