[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b533ab3e-41e8-4078-99c9-1a9d80470279@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:21:46 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm,psci: Allow S2RAM power_state
parameter description
On 20.12.2024 3:04 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 02:57:34PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 20.12.2024 2:55 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>>
>>> Please take a look at the preconditions for both the calls. They are
>>> different.
>>
>> Which is *precisely* why I want to tell the OS that it's a S2RAM state,
>> so that different actions can be taken in peripheral device drivers.
>
> Yes we do that for SYSTEM_SUSPEND. And CPU_SUSPEND is not SYSTEM_SUSPEND
> hence 2 different APIs. My NACK still stands.
I'll just paste it here one more time to reassure you they are indeed
the same under the hood
https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/blob/master/lib/psci/psci_main.c#L179-L221
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists