[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241221091311.GCZ2aGp1JeqKBL_PzL@fat_crate.local>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 10:13:11 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amit@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
amit.shah@....com, thomas.lendacky@....com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, corbet@....net, mingo@...hat.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com,
kai.huang@...el.com, sandipan.das@....com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, Babu.Moger@....com,
david.kaplan@....com, dwmw@...zon.co.uk, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/bugs: Don't fill RSB on VMEXIT with
eIBRS+retpoline
On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 03:12:07PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Ok, I'll try to write up a document. I'm thinking it should go in its
> own return-based-attacks.rst file rather than spectre.rst, which is more
> of an outdated historical document at this point.
Thanks!
> And we want this document to actually be read (and kept up to date) by
> developers instead of mostly ignored like the others.
Good idea.
Now how do we enforce this?
We could add a rule to checkpatch or to some other patch checking script
like mine here for example :-)
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git/log/?h=vp
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists