lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <333e584c-2688-4a3f-bc1f-2e84d5215005@126.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 20:04:59 +0800
From: Ge Yang <yangge1116@....com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
 21cnbao@...il.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, muchun.song@...ux.dev,
 liuzixing@...on.cn, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
 Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] replace free hugepage folios after migration



在 2024/12/21 0:30, David Hildenbrand 写道:
> On 20.12.24 09:56, Ge Yang wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2024/12/20 0:40, David Hildenbrand 写道:
>>> On 18.12.24 07:33, yangge1116@....com wrote:
>>>> From: yangge <yangge1116@....com>
>>>
>>> CCing Oscar, who worked on migrating these pages during memory offlining
>>> and alloc_contig_range().
>>>
>>>>
>>>> My machine has 4 NUMA nodes, each equipped with 32GB of memory. I
>>>> have configured each NUMA node with 16GB of CMA and 16GB of in-use
>>>> hugetlb pages. The allocation of contiguous memory via the
>>>> cma_alloc() function can fail probabilistically.
>>>>
>>>> The cma_alloc() function may fail if it sees an in-use hugetlb page
>>>> within the allocation range, even if that page has already been
>>>> migrated. When in-use hugetlb pages are migrated, they may simply
>>>> be released back into the free hugepage pool instead of being
>>>> returned to the buddy system. This can cause the
>>>> test_pages_isolated() function check to fail, ultimately leading
>>>> to the failure of the cma_alloc() function:
>>>> cma_alloc()
>>>>       __alloc_contig_migrate_range() // migrate in-use hugepage
>>>>       test_pages_isolated()
>>>>           __test_page_isolated_in_pageblock()
>>>>                PageBuddy(page) // check if the page is in buddy
>>>
>>> I thought this would be working as expected, at least we tested it with
>>> alloc_contig_range / virtio-mem a while ago.
>>>
>>> On the memory_offlining path, we migrate hugetlb folios, but also
>>> dissolve any remaining free folios even if it means that we will going
>>> below the requested number of hugetlb pages in our pool.
>>>
>>> During alloc_contig_range(), we only migrate them, to then free them up
>>> after migration.
>>>
>>> Under which circumstances doe sit apply that "they may simply be
>>> released back into the free hugepage pool instead of being returned to
>>> the buddy system"?
>>>
>>
>> After migration, in-use hugetlb pages are only released back to the
>> hugetlb pool and are not returned to the buddy system.
> 
> We had
> 
> commit ae37c7ff79f1f030e28ec76c46ee032f8fd07607
> Author: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
> Date:   Tue May 4 18:35:29 2021 -0700
> 
>      mm: make alloc_contig_range handle in-use hugetlb pages
>      alloc_contig_range() will fail if it finds a HugeTLB page within the
>      range, without a chance to handle them.  Since HugeTLB pages can be
>      migrated as any LRU or Movable page, it does not make sense to bail 
> out
>      without trying.  Enable the interface to recognize in-use HugeTLB 
> pages so
>      we can migrate them, and have much better chances to succeed the call.
> 
> 
> And I am trying to figure out if it never worked correctly, or if
> something changed that broke it.
> 
> 
> In start_isolate_page_range()->isolate_migratepages_block(), we do the
> 
>      ret = isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(page, &cc->migratepages);
> 
> to add these folios to the cc->migratepages list.
> 
> In __alloc_contig_migrate_range(), we migrate the pages using 
> migrate_pages().
> 
> 
> After that, the src hugetlb folios should still be isolated? 
Yes.

But I'm
> getting
> confused when these pages get un-silated and putback to hugetlb/freed.
> 
If the migration is successful, call folio_putback_active_hugetlb to 
release the src hugetlb folios back to the free hugetlb pool.

trace:
unmap_and_move_huge_page
     folio_putback_active_hugetlb
         folio_put
             free_huge_folio

alloc_contig_range_noprof
     __alloc_contig_migrate_range
     if (test_pages_isolated())  //to determine if hugetlb pages in buddy
         isolate_freepages_range //grab isolated pages from freelists.
     else
         undo_isolate_page_range //undo isolate

> 
>>
>> The specific steps for reproduction are as follows:
>> 1,Reserve hugetlb pages. Some of these hugetlb pages are allocated
>> within the CMA area.
>> echo 10240 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
>>
>> 2,To ensure that hugetlb pages are in an in-use state, we can use the
>> following command.
>> qemu-system-x86_64 \
>>     -mem-prealloc \
>>     -mem-path /dev/hugepage/ \
>>     ...
>>
>> 3,At this point, using cma_alloc() to allocate contiguous memory may
>> result in a probable failure.
>>
> 
> Will these free hugetlb folios become surplus pages? I would have assumed
> they get freed immediately to the buddy, or does you config maybe allow for
> surplus pages?
> 
These freed hugetlb folios will not become surplus pages. I have not 
configured the system to allow for the existence of surplus pages.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ