[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <abadd51d-f350-4bf6-99b2-28976c6a6b66@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 15:29:52 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] dt-bindings: watchdog: renesas: Document
`renesas,r9a09g057-syscon-wdt-errorrst` property
On 22/12/2024 12:11, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
>>> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241218003414.490498-6-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/
>>
>> Really? I see in rzv2h_wdt_probe():
>>
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>>
>> so to me you are failing the probe, not skipping anything.
>>
> Yes really this wont break any ABI. From patch [0] we have the below:
>
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241218003414.490498-6-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/
>
> /* Do not error out to maintain old DT compatibility */
> syscon = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np,
> "renesas,syscon-cpg-error-rst");
Right, somehow I missed that part.
> if (!IS_ERR(syscon)) {
> struct of_phandle_args args;
> u32 reg;
>
> ret = of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(np,
> "renesas,syscon-cpg-error-rst",
> 2, 0, &args);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists