[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de313b43-4e90-4b3a-a233-917a963810c8@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 09:53:59 +0530
From: Raj Kumar Bhagat <quic_rajkbhag@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Jeff Johnson
<jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>,
<ath12k@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"Rob
Herring" <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"Conor
Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>,
"Bjorn
Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: net: wireless: Describe ath12k
PCI module with WSI
On 12/21/2024 3:35 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 20.12.2024 10:47 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> On 12/20/2024 12:03 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 5.11.2024 7:04 PM, Raj Kumar Bhagat wrote:
>>>> The QCN9274 WiFi device supports WSI (WLAN Serial Interface). WSI is used
>>>> to exchange specific control information across radios using a doorbell
>>>> mechanism. This WSI connection is essential for exchanging control
>>>> information among these devices. The WSI interface in the QCN9274 includes
>>>> TX and RX ports, which are used to connect multiple WSI-supported devices
>>>> together, forming a WSI group.
>>>>
>>>> Describe QCN9274 PCI wifi device with WSI interface.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Raj Kumar Bhagat <quic_rajkbhag@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> I think this description is missing the key points:
>>>
>>> * what is that control information (power, data, radio stuff?)
>>> * what happens when the OS is unaware of all of this (i.e. what happens when
>>> we don't send any configuration)
>>> * is this configurable, or does this describe a physical wiring topology
>>> (what/who decides which of the group configurations detailed below take
>>> effect)
>>>
>>> And the ultimate question:
>>> * can the devices not just talk among themselves and negotiate that?
>>>
>>> Though AFAICU PCIe P2P communication is a shaky topic, so perhaps the answer
>>> to the last question is 'no'
>>>
>>> Konrad
>>
>> We already pushed the non-RFC version to our -next tree so we cannot update
>> the commit description without a forced push.
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241211153432.775335-2-kvalo@kernel.org/
>>
>> However, Raj Kumar can submit an update to the description in the file, which
>> is probably the better place to have this information anyway.
>
> Sounds good
>
Sure, will submit an update to the description.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists