[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241223043407.1611-7-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 04:34:05 +0000
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Dietmar Eggemann
<dietmar.eggemann@....com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall
<bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Valentin Schneider
<vschneid@...hat.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>, Tim Chen
<tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>, "Mario
Limonciello" <mario.limonciello@....com>, Meng Li <li.meng@....com>, Huang
Rui <ray.huang@....com>, "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>, "K
Prateek Nayak" <kprateek.nayak@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/8] sched/fair: Do not compute NUMA Balancing stats unnecessarily during lb
Aggregate nr_numa_running and nr_preferred_running when load balancing
at NUMA domains only. While at it, also move the aggregation below the
idle_cpu() check since an idle CPU cannot have any preferred tasks.
Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
---
v1..v2:
o Collected tags from Vincent and Srikanth.
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 8f641c9e74a8..c68ab808d271 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -10346,7 +10346,7 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
bool *sg_overloaded,
bool *sg_overutilized)
{
- int i, nr_running, local_group;
+ int i, nr_running, local_group, sd_flags = env->sd->flags;
memset(sgs, 0, sizeof(*sgs));
@@ -10370,10 +10370,6 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
if (cpu_overutilized(i))
*sg_overutilized = 1;
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
- sgs->nr_numa_running += rq->nr_numa_running;
- sgs->nr_preferred_running += rq->nr_preferred_running;
-#endif
/*
* No need to call idle_cpu() if nr_running is not 0
*/
@@ -10383,10 +10379,17 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
continue;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
+ /* Only fbq_classify_group() uses this to classify NUMA groups */
+ if (sd_flags & SD_NUMA) {
+ sgs->nr_numa_running += rq->nr_numa_running;
+ sgs->nr_preferred_running += rq->nr_preferred_running;
+ }
+#endif
if (local_group)
continue;
- if (env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY) {
+ if (sd_flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY) {
/* Check for a misfit task on the cpu */
if (sgs->group_misfit_task_load < rq->misfit_task_load) {
sgs->group_misfit_task_load = rq->misfit_task_load;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists