lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44de3a6c-6761-4ad6-a4dd-b9002a42c437@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 11:42:57 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: nao.horiguchi@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/memory-failure: fix
 VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(page)) when unpoison memory

On 23.12.24 03:55, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2024/12/20 16:50, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 20.12.24 03:35, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>> On 2024/12/19 20:18, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> On 19.12.24 12:52, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>>>> When I did memory failure tests recently, below panic occurs:
>>>>>
>>>>> page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(page))
>>>>> kernel BUG at include/linux/page-flags.h:616!
>>>>> Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
>>>>> CPU: 3 PID: 720 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.10.0-rc1-00195-g148743902568 #40
>>>>> RIP: 0010:unpoison_memory+0x2f3/0x590
>>>>> RSP: 0018:ffffa57fc8787d60 EFLAGS: 00000246
>>>>> RAX: 0000000000000037 RBX: 0000000000000009 RCX: ffff9be25fcdc9c8
>>>>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff9be25fcdc9c0
>>>>> RBP: 0000000000300000 R08: ffffffffb4956f88 R09: 0000000000009ffb
>>>>> R10: 0000000000000284 R11: ffffffffb4926fa0 R12: ffffe6b00c000000
>>>>> R13: ffff9bdb453dfd00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: fffffffffffffffe
>>>>> FS:  00007f08f04e4740(0000) GS:ffff9be25fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>>> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>>>> CR2: 0000564787a30410 CR3: 000000010d4e2000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
>>>>> Call Trace:
>>>>>     <TASK>
>>>>>     unpoison_memory+0x2f3/0x590
>>>>>     simple_attr_write_xsigned.constprop.0.isra.0+0xb3/0x110
>>>>>     debugfs_attr_write+0x42/0x60
>>>>>     full_proxy_write+0x5b/0x80
>>>>>     vfs_write+0xd5/0x540
>>>>>     ksys_write+0x64/0xe0
>>>>>     do_syscall_64+0xb9/0x1d0
>>>>>     entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>>>>> RIP: 0033:0x7f08f0314887
>>>>> RSP: 002b:00007ffece710078 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
>>>>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000009 RCX: 00007f08f0314887
>>>>> RDX: 0000000000000009 RSI: 0000564787a30410 RDI: 0000000000000001
>>>>> RBP: 0000564787a30410 R08: 000000000000fefe R09: 000000007fffffff
>>>>> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000009
>>>>> R13: 00007f08f041b780 R14: 00007f08f0417600 R15: 00007f08f0416a00
>>>>>     </TASK>
>>>>> Modules linked in: hwpoison_inject
>>>>> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>>>> RIP: 0010:unpoison_memory+0x2f3/0x590
>>>>> RSP: 0018:ffffa57fc8787d60 EFLAGS: 00000246
>>>>> RAX: 0000000000000037 RBX: 0000000000000009 RCX: ffff9be25fcdc9c8
>>>>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff9be25fcdc9c0
>>>>> RBP: 0000000000300000 R08: ffffffffb4956f88 R09: 0000000000009ffb
>>>>> R10: 0000000000000284 R11: ffffffffb4926fa0 R12: ffffe6b00c000000
>>>>> R13: ffff9bdb453dfd00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: fffffffffffffffe
>>>>> FS:  00007f08f04e4740(0000) GS:ffff9be25fcc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>>> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>>>> CR2: 0000564787a30410 CR3: 000000010d4e2000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
>>>>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
>>>>> Kernel Offset: 0x31c00000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff)
>>>>> ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception ]---
>>>>>
>>>>> The root cause is that unpoison_memory() tries to check the PG_HWPoison
>>>>> flags of an uninitialized page. So VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(page)) is
>>>>> triggered. This can be reproduced by below steps:
>>>>> 1.Offline memory block:
>>>>>     echo offline > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory12/state
>>>>> 2.Get offlined memory pfn:
>>>>>     page-types -b n -rlN
>>>>> 3.Write pfn to unpoison-pfn
>>>>>     echo <pfn> > /sys/kernel/debug/hwpoison/unpoison-pfn
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> v2: Use pfn_to_online_page per David. Thanks.
>>>>> ---
>>>>>     mm/memory-failure.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>>>>>     1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
>>>>> index a7b8ccd29b6f..02be0596ce67 100644
>>>>> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
>>>>> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
>>>>> @@ -2556,10 +2556,18 @@ int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn)
>>>>>         static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(unpoison_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
>>>>>                         DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
>>>>>     -    if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
>>>>> -        return -ENXIO;
>>>>> +    p = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
>>>>> +    if (!p) {
>>>>> +        struct dev_pagemap *pgmap;
>>>>>     -    p = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>>>>> +        if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
>>>>> +            return -ENXIO;
>>>>> +        pgmap = get_dev_pagemap(pfn, NULL);
>>>>> +        if (!pgmap)
>>>>> +            return -ENXIO;
>>>>> +        put_dev_pagemap(pgmap);
>>>>> +        p = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>>>>> +    }
>>>>
>>>> Hm, I wonder if we can do anything reasonable with ZONE_DEVICE pages here?
>>>
>>> All I can see in unpoison_memory() is folio_test_clear_hwpoison() for ZONE_DEVICE pages.
>>
>> IIRC, it can only be triggered via debugfs in special kernel configs. So chances are this was never ever actually run against a ZONE_DEVICE page.
> 
> If ZONE_DEVICE pages are never expected, we can simply filter them out.

Looking into some details, I think we should just ignore ZONE_DEVICE for 
now, I'm pretty sure that it's not handled correctly.

So I suggest to fail if pfn_to_online_page() == NULL, just like 
soft_offline_page() would.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ