[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17b60889-8d1a-4c90-854c-104f1604c5bc@bytedance.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 20:34:27 +0800
From: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com
Cc: chengming.zhou@...ux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched/fair: Remove unused task_numa_migrate return
value
Hello Prateek,
在 2024/12/18 14:29, K Prateek Nayak 写道:
> Hello Chuyi,
>
> On 12/16/2024 5:53 PM, Chuyi Zhou wrote:
>> The return value of task_numa_migrate is unused, remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>
>
> Feel free to include:
>
> Reviewed-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
>
> If anyone cares for the history, initial NUMA Balancing implementation
> used the return value of task_numa_migrate() to retry NUMA Balancing in
> commit 6b9a7460b6ba ("sched/numa: Retry migration of tasks to CPU on a
> preferred node") however in the same series[1], Mel also included an
> optimization from Rik which retried NUMA Balancing periodically
> irrespective the return value from task_numa_migrate() in commit
> 2739d3eef3a9 ("sched/numa: Retry task_numa_migrate() periodically")
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/1381141781-10992-34-git-send-email-
> mgorman@...e.de/
>
Thank you for providing the historical information! I will incorporate
it into the next version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists