[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAN4iqtRuj9M=GzFbY-hY4Ks3ktSKfA2W5yLT19vkJ2CSe1it9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 21:23:43 -0500
From: Mingwei Zheng <zmw12306@...il.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Cc: antonio.borneo@...s.st.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, make24@...as.ac.cn,
peng.fan@....com, fabien.dessenne@...s.st.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] pinctrl: stm32: Add check for clk_enable()
Hi Marek,
On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 6:54 PM Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de> wrote:
>
> On 12/15/24 9:40 PM, Mingwei Zheng wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -1617,10 +1602,18 @@ int stm32_pctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > pctl->banks = devm_kcalloc(dev, banks, sizeof(*pctl->banks),
> > - GFP_KERNEL);
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Please drop this one change.
Fixed in PATCH v6.
>
> > if (!pctl->banks)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > + pctl->clks = devm_kcalloc(dev, banks, sizeof(*pctl->clks),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!pctl->clks)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < banks; ++i)
> > + pctl->clks[i].id = "";
>
> Is this ^ assignment necessary ? If so, why ?
>
> [...]
Thanks for pointing this out. We call devm_clk_bulk_get_all in
stm32_pctl_probe() to handle get clk in PATCH v6.
Best,
Mingwei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists