linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 05/15] hwmon: Fix Intel family checks to include extended family numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <89acce43-b4f6-434a-96c3-1a2874116b5f@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 10:13:45 -0800
From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, <x86@...nel.org>, Dave Hansen
	<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim
	<namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, "Alexander
 Shishkin" <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	"Kan Liang" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Thomas Gleixner
	<tglx@...utronix.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "H . Peter Anvin"
	<hpa@...or.com>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown
	<lenb@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Viresh Kumar
	<viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Jean Delvare
	<jdelvare@...e.com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	<linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 05/15] hwmon: Fix Intel family checks to include
 extended family numbers

On 12/21/2024 9:27 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:


>> Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> 

Thank you for the Ack.

> The patch is independent, but since it is submitted as part of a series
> and there is no comment suggesting otherwise, I assume that it is expected
> to be pushed together with that series, and I won't take it into the hwmon
> branch.
> 

This first RFC version was mainly intended to be a conversation starter.
I am not very familiar with hwmon and my testing has been fairly
limited. I was hoping we can get at least one tested-by on this patch
before merging it.

I have tried to keep all the patches independent to make it easier to
merge whenever they seem ready. Please feel free to merge the patch if
it seems so.

Sohil