[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6d05aa3-95f2-83d3-ef20-75305f928992@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 10:37:58 +0530
From: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>, <konradybcio@...nel.org>, <richard@....at>,
<vigneshr@...com>, <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>,
<quic_varada@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 0/8] Add QPIC SPI NAND driver
On 12/24/2024 12:44 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
>>> v14:
>>> * Updated commit message
>>> * Fix spelling mistake
>>> * Remove "inline" from multiple APIs from qcom_nandc.c file
>>> * Move '|' in qcom_param_page_type_exec() APIs at the end of line
>>
>> I guess it is now time to move on, I can apply patches 2-5 and share an
>> immutable tag.
>
> Do you want an immutable tag or will you wait the next cycle to apply
> the spi patches?
Please share the tag. Will apply the remaining patches (and resolve
conflicts, if any) and ensure they work as expected.
Thanks
Alam.
>> However, due to the frequent inconsistencies observed
>> during the lifetime of this patchset, we might be slightly more
>> conservative than usual and split the patches over two kernel
>> releases. I fear there might be annoying fixes on the mtd side needed
>> because of some side effects. Without these, the spi tree might have
>> broken qcom support for several weeks. What do you think?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists