[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32c7ef0a-8da6-449a-8f2d-59965aa622ec@rock-chips.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 17:34:17 +0800
From: Damon Ding <damon.ding@...k-chips.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: heiko@...ech.de, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, rfoss@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
sebastian.reichel@...labora.com, cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com,
l.stach@...gutronix.de, andy.yan@...k-chips.com, hjc@...k-chips.com,
algea.cao@...k-chips.com, kever.yang@...k-chips.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/15] arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable eDP0 display on
RK3588S EVB1 board
Hi Dmitry,
On 2024/12/20 13:38, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 at 04:38, Damon Ding <damon.ding@...k-chips.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
>> On 2024/12/20 8:20, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 04:06:03PM +0800, Damon Ding wrote:
>>>> Add the necessary DT changes to enable eDP0 on RK3588S EVB1 board:
>>>> - Add edp-panel node
>>>> - Set pinctrl of pwm12 for backlight
>>>> - Enable edp0/hdptxphy0/vp2
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Damon Ding <damon.ding@...k-chips.com>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>> - Remove brightness-levels and default-brightness-level properties in
>>>> backlight node.
>>>> - Add the detail DT changes to commit message.
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>> - Use aux-bus instead of platform bus for edp-panel.
>>>> ---
>>>> .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-evb1-v10.dts | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-evb1-v10.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-evb1-v10.dts
>>>> index bc4077575beb..9547ab18e596 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-evb1-v10.dts
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-evb1-v10.dts
>>>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>>> #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>>>> #include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
>>>> #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h>
>>>> +#include <dt-bindings/soc/rockchip,vop2.h>
>>>> #include <dt-bindings/usb/pd.h>
>>>> #include "rk3588s.dtsi"
>>>>
>>>> @@ -238,6 +239,41 @@ &combphy2_psu {
>>>> status = "okay";
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> +&edp0 {
>>>> + force-hpd;
>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>> +
>>>> + aux-bus {
>>>> + panel {
>>>> + compatible = "lg,lp079qx1-sp0v";
>>>
>>> Why do you need the particular compat string here? Can you use the
>>> generic "edp-panel" instead? What if the user swaps the panel?
>>>
>>
>> The eDP panels used in conjunction with the RK3588S EVB1 have broken
>> identification, which is one of the valid reasons for using a particular
>> compat string. So the generic_edp_panel_probe() can not return success
>> when using the "edp-panel".
>
> Broken how? I don't see such info in the commit message.
>
The log related to the broken identification may be like:
[ 0.623793] panel-simple-dp-aux aux-fdec0000.edp: Unknown panel ETC
0x0000, using conservative timings
The eDP panel used in RK3588S EVB1 is indeed the LP079QX1_SP0V model, it
should be also reasonable to use the "lg,lp079qx1-sp0v".
And I will mention all of the above in the commit message for the next
version.
>>
>>>> + backlight = <&backlight>;
>>>> + power-supply = <&vcc3v3_lcd_edp>;
>>>> +
>>>> + port {
>>>> + panel_in_edp: endpoint {
>>>> + remote-endpoint = <&edp_out_panel>;
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> + };
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +&edp0_in {
>>>> + edp0_in_vp2: endpoint {
>>>> + remote-endpoint = <&vp2_out_edp0>;
>>>> + };
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +&edp0_out {
>>>> + edp_out_panel: endpoint {
>>>> + remote-endpoint = <&panel_in_edp>;
>>>> + };
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +&hdptxphy0 {
>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> &i2c3 {
>>>> status = "okay";
>>>>
>>>> @@ -399,6 +435,7 @@ usbc0_int: usbc0-int {
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> &pwm12 {
>>>> + pinctrl-0 = <&pwm12m1_pins>;
>>>> status = "okay";
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> @@ -1168,3 +1205,18 @@ usbdp_phy0_dp_altmode_mux: endpoint@1 {
>>>> };
>>>> };
>>>> };
>>>> +
>>>> +&vop_mmu {
>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +&vop {
>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +&vp2 {
>>>> + vp2_out_edp0: endpoint@...KCHIP_VOP2_EP_EDP0 {
>>>> + reg = <ROCKCHIP_VOP2_EP_EDP0>;
>>>> + remote-endpoint = <&edp0_in_vp2>;
>>>> + };
>>>> +};
>>>> --
>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>
Best regards
Damon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists