linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH] fs/pipe: Introduce a check to skip sleeping processes during pipe read/write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9B33A2E79ADF512B+c7748c58-9b1c-4759-8131-1007c08e9f46@uniontech.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 00:32:35 +0800
From: WangYuli <wangyuli@...ontech.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
 Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
 brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] fs/pipe: Introduce a check to skip sleeping
 processes during pipe read/write

Hi,

I've reviewed the Contributor Covenant and the Linux Kernel Contributor 
Covenant Code of Conduct Interpretation, and I couldn't find anything 
suggesting that CCing a large number of people is "unfriendly".

And while I don't believe my actions were malicious, I understand your 
concern.

Going forward, I'll be more considerate of the recipients when sending 
emails and will avoid CCing more than a hundred people at once in 
similar situations.


On 2024/12/26 00:00, Willy Tarreau wrote:

> (...)
>
> Sorry, but by CCing 191 random addresses like this,

I think there may be a misunderstanding.

These all recipients can be found in the git history of fs/pipe.c.

> that's the best way
> to be added to .procmailrc and be completely ignored by everyone. At some
> point one should wonder whether that's a common practice or if such
> behaviors will be considered offensive by the majority. get_maintainer.pl
> only lists the 2 lists and 3 addresses I left in CC (after Kent and Andy
> whom I left since they replied to you).
>
>> This patch, for example, has been submitted multiple times without receiving
>> any response, unfortunately.
> It can happen, but sending to the right people and possibly resending if
> it gets lost is usually sufficient to attract attention. Sending to that
> many people make you look like someone feeling so important they need to
> shout in a loudspeaker to send orders to everyone.
Sincerely hope that's the case.
>   Please refrain from
> doing this in the future.
As above.

Thanks,
-- 
WangYuli

Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xC5DA1F3046F40BEE.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (633 bytes)

Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (237 bytes)