| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <676ceadb.050a0220.226966.007a.GAE@google.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 21:34:19 -0800
From: syzbot <syzbot+ccdfb85a561b973219c7@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, horms@...nel.org,
kuba@...nel.org, linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [hams?] possible deadlock in nr_rt_device_down (3)
syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 9b2ffa6148b1 Merge tag 'mtd/fixes-for-6.13-rc5' of git://g..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11dac0b0580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=4c4096b0d467a682
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=ccdfb85a561b973219c7
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=14869adf980000
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/dbe249d9f678/disk-9b2ffa61.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/ef6ad79e83bf/vmlinux-9b2ffa61.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/4d67490d157d/bzImage-9b2ffa61.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+ccdfb85a561b973219c7@...kaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.13.0-rc4-syzkaller-00012-g9b2ffa6148b1 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.3.1344/8689 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8fdf2318 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
ffffffff8fdf2318 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: nr_rt_device_down+0xb5/0x7b0 net/netrom/nr_route.c:517
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8fdf22b8 (nr_neigh_list_lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
ffffffff8fdf22b8 (nr_neigh_list_lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: nr_rt_device_down+0x28/0x7b0 net/netrom/nr_route.c:514
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (nr_neigh_list_lock){+...}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
nr_remove_neigh net/netrom/nr_route.c:307 [inline]
nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:472 [inline]
nr_rt_ioctl+0x398/0xfb0 net/netrom/nr_route.c:692
sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1209
sock_ioctl+0x626/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1328
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #1 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline]
nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:459 [inline]
nr_rt_ioctl+0x192/0xfb0 net/netrom/nr_route.c:692
sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1209
sock_ioctl+0x626/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1328
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #0 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
__lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
nr_rt_device_down+0xb5/0x7b0 net/netrom/nr_route.c:517
nr_device_event+0x134/0x150 net/netrom/af_netrom.c:126
notifier_call_chain+0x1a5/0x3f0 kernel/notifier.c:85
__dev_notify_flags+0x207/0x400
dev_change_flags+0xf0/0x1a0 net/core/dev.c:9026
dev_ifsioc+0x7c8/0xe70 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:526
dev_ioctl+0x719/0x1340 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:783
sock_do_ioctl+0x240/0x460 net/socket.c:1223
sock_ioctl+0x626/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1328
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
nr_node_list_lock --> &nr_node->node_lock --> nr_neigh_list_lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(nr_neigh_list_lock);
lock(&nr_node->node_lock);
lock(nr_neigh_list_lock);
lock(nr_node_list_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by syz.3.1344/8689:
#0: ffffffff8fca0788 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dev_ioctl+0x706/0x1340 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:782
#1: ffffffff8fdf22b8 (nr_neigh_list_lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8fdf22b8 (nr_neigh_list_lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: nr_rt_device_down+0x28/0x7b0 net/netrom/nr_route.c:514
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 8689 Comm: syz.3.1344 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-syzkaller-00012-g9b2ffa6148b1 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
__lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
nr_rt_device_down+0xb5/0x7b0 net/netrom/nr_route.c:517
nr_device_event+0x134/0x150 net/netrom/af_netrom.c:126
notifier_call_chain+0x1a5/0x3f0 kernel/notifier.c:85
__dev_notify_flags+0x207/0x400
dev_change_flags+0xf0/0x1a0 net/core/dev.c:9026
dev_ifsioc+0x7c8/0xe70 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:526
dev_ioctl+0x719/0x1340 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:783
sock_do_ioctl+0x240/0x460 net/socket.c:1223
sock_ioctl+0x626/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1328
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f610cf85d29
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f610dd56038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f610d176160 RCX: 00007f610cf85d29
RDX: 0000000020000000 RSI: 0000000000008914 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007f610d001aa8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f610d176160 R15: 00007ffe09d33fa8
</TASK>
---
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists