linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/dp: Add helper to set LTTPRs in transparent mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z21HimmBvwwA7/KD@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 14:09:46 +0200
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
	Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>, Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...hat.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
	Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
	Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
	Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/dp: Add helper to set LTTPRs in transparent
 mode

On 24-12-11 21:22:00, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 03:04:12PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > According to the DisplayPort standard, LTTPRs have two operating
> > modes:
> >  - non-transparent - it replies to DPCD LTTPR field specific AUX
> >    requests, while passes through all other AUX requests
> >  - transparent - it passes through all AUX requests.
> > 
> > Switching between this two modes is done by the DPTX by issuing
> > an AUX write to the DPCD PHY_REPEATER_MODE register.
> > 
> > Add a generic helper that allows switching between these modes.
> > 
> > Also add a generic wrapper for the helper that handles the explicit
> > disabling of non-transparent mode and its disable->enable sequence
> > mentioned in the DP Standard v2.0 section 3.6.6.1. Do this in order
> > to move this handling out of the vendor specific driver implementation
> > into the generic framework.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h     |  2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
> > 
> 
> 
> > +/**
> > + * drm_dp_lttpr_init - init LTTPR transparency mode according to DP standard
> > + *
> > + * @aux: DisplayPort AUX channel
> > + * @lttpr_count: Number of LTTPRs
> > + *
> > + * Returns 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
> > + */
> > +int drm_dp_lttpr_init(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, int lttpr_count)
> > +{
> > +	if (!lttpr_count)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * See DP Standard v2.0 3.6.6.1 about the explicit disabling of
> > +	 * non-transparent mode and the disable->enable non-transparent mode
> > +	 * sequence.
> > +	 */
> > +	drm_dp_lttpr_set_transparent_mode(aux, true);
> > +
> > +	if (lttpr_count > 0 && !drm_dp_lttpr_set_transparent_mode(aux, false))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Roll-back to tranparent mode if setting non-tranparent mode failed or
> > +	 * the number of LTTPRs is invalid
> > +	 */
> > +	drm_dp_lttpr_set_transparent_mode(aux, true);
> 
> This means that if lttpr_count < 0, then there will be two requests to
> set LTTPRs to a transparent mode. Is that expected?

Yes, exactly. If counting the LTTPRs (see drm_dp_lttpr_count) results in an
invalid number (e.g. more than 8), then according to the DP standard,
we need to roll back to transparent mode.

Do you think I need to re-word the comment above more to make it more
clearer?

> 
> > +
> > +	return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_lttpr_init);
> > +
> 
> -- 
> With best wishes
> Dmitry

Thanks for reviewing,
Abel