[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241226170710.1159679-16-surenb@google.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 09:07:07 -0800
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, willy@...radead.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, mhocko@...e.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
hannes@...xchg.org, mjguzik@...il.com, oliver.sang@...el.com,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, david@...hat.com, peterx@...hat.com,
oleg@...hat.com, dave@...olabs.net, paulmck@...nel.org, brauner@...nel.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, hdanton@...a.com, hughd@...gle.com,
lokeshgidra@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com, jannh@...gle.com,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, souravpanda@...gle.com, pasha.tatashin@...een.com,
klarasmodin@...il.com, corbet@....net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
surenb@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH v7 15/17] mm: prepare lock_vma_under_rcu() for vma reuse possibility
Once we make vma cache SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, it will be possible for a vma
to be reused and attached to another mm after lock_vma_under_rcu() locks
the vma. lock_vma_under_rcu() should ensure that vma_start_read() is using
the original mm and after locking the vma it should ensure that vma->vm_mm
has not changed from under us.
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
---
include/linux/mm.h | 10 ++++++----
mm/memory.c | 7 ++++---
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 40bbe815df11..56a7d70ca5bd 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -730,8 +730,10 @@ static inline void vma_refcount_put(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
* Try to read-lock a vma. The function is allowed to occasionally yield false
* locked result to avoid performance overhead, in which case we fall back to
* using mmap_lock. The function should never yield false unlocked result.
+ * False locked result is possible if mm_lock_seq overflows or if vma gets
+ * reused and attached to a different mm before we lock it.
*/
-static inline bool vma_start_read(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+static inline bool vma_start_read(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
int oldcnt;
@@ -742,7 +744,7 @@ static inline bool vma_start_read(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
* we don't rely on for anything - the mm_lock_seq read against which we
* need ordering is below.
*/
- if (READ_ONCE(vma->vm_lock_seq) == READ_ONCE(vma->vm_mm->mm_lock_seq.sequence))
+ if (READ_ONCE(vma->vm_lock_seq) == READ_ONCE(mm->mm_lock_seq.sequence))
return false;
@@ -767,7 +769,7 @@ static inline bool vma_start_read(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
* This pairs with RELEASE semantics in vma_end_write_all().
*/
if (unlikely(oldcnt & VMA_LOCK_OFFSET ||
- vma->vm_lock_seq == raw_read_seqcount(&vma->vm_mm->mm_lock_seq))) {
+ vma->vm_lock_seq == raw_read_seqcount(&mm->mm_lock_seq))) {
vma_refcount_put(vma);
return false;
}
@@ -905,7 +907,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *lock_vma_under_rcu(struct mm_struct *mm,
static inline void vma_lockdep_init(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
static inline void vma_init_lock(struct vm_area_struct *vma, bool reset_refcnt) {}
-static inline bool vma_start_read(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+static inline bool vma_start_read(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{ return false; }
static inline void vma_end_read(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
static inline void vma_start_write(struct vm_area_struct *vma) {}
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 2def47b5dff0..9cc93c2f79f3 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -6414,7 +6414,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *lock_vma_under_rcu(struct mm_struct *mm,
if (!vma)
goto inval;
- if (!vma_start_read(vma))
+ if (!vma_start_read(mm, vma))
goto inval;
/*
@@ -6424,8 +6424,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct *lock_vma_under_rcu(struct mm_struct *mm,
* fields are accessible for RCU readers.
*/
- /* Check since vm_start/vm_end might change before we lock the VMA */
- if (unlikely(address < vma->vm_start || address >= vma->vm_end))
+ /* Check if the vma we locked is the right one. */
+ if (unlikely(vma->vm_mm != mm ||
+ address < vma->vm_start || address >= vma->vm_end))
goto inval_end_read;
rcu_read_unlock();
--
2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists