[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s2tdxcpmgvxhcne6go23p5qdwra37adl3igz6w37n6espbe77s@bc25jxnwxgt6>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 09:05:32 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
Cc: lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
robh@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, quic_nsekar@...cinc.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,uniphy-pcie: Document PCIe
uniphy
On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 03:54:28PM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> +title: Qualcomm UNIPHY PCIe 28LP PHY
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Nitheesh Sekar <quic_nsekar@...cinc.com>
> + - Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
> +
> +description:
> + PCIe and USB combo PHY found in Qualcomm IPQ5332 SoC
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - qcom,ipq5332-uniphy-gen3x1-pcie-phy
> + - qcom,ipq5332-uniphy-gen3x2-pcie-phy
These do not look like separate devices. Why num-lanes property cannot
be used?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists